{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Thouvenin","provider_url":"https:\/\/thouvenin.com\/en\/","title":"Revision of an Award for Lack of Independence of an Arbitrator - an Invitation to the Law Maker | Thouvenin Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zSzbQ2RIuQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thouvenin.com\/en\/revision-award-lack-independence-arbitrator-invitation-law-maker\/\">Revision of an Award for Lack of Independence of an Arbitrator &#8211; an Invitation to the Law Maker<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/thouvenin.com\/en\/revision-award-lack-independence-arbitrator-invitation-law-maker\/embed\/#?secret=zSzbQ2RIuQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Revision of an Award for Lack of Independence of an Arbitrator &#8211; an Invitation to the Law Maker&#8221; &#8212; Thouvenin\" data-secret=\"zSzbQ2RIuQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/thouvenin.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"The decision of the Federal Supreme Court analysed in our arbitration newsletter covers actually two issues, namely (i) can a request for revision due to lack of independence of an arbitrator be based on facts which became known only after the award has been rendered and after the lapse of the 30 day time limit [&hellip;]"}